Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
USA v. One 2001 Ford F-350 Super Duty, bearing Puerto Rico License Plate 927-492, VIN 1FTWN33F61EB97089, with an estimated value of $5,375.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2015cv02345
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: One 2001 Ford F-350 Super Duty, bearing Puerto Rico License Plate 927-492, VIN 1FTWN33F61EB97089, with an estimated value of $5,375.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
USA v. $61,008.83 in U.S. Currency, et al.
as 3:2015cv02130
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $61,008.83 in U.S. Currency, One (1) BPPR Certified Check in the Amount of $40,375.14 and One (1) 2010 Ford F-150 Harley Davidson Edition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
USA v. A). One 2004 Kawasaki Club Golf Cart, Puerto Rico License Plate No. FTY173, VIN: AG0207119447; et al
as 3:2013cv01220
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: A). One 2004 Kawasaki Club Golf Cart, Puerto Rico License Plate No. FTY173, VIN: AG0207119447, B). One 2005 Navy Blue Ford F-250, Puerto Rico License Plate No. 796-761, VIN: 1FTSW21P65E35141, C). One 1999 Black Toyota 4 Runner, Puerto Rico License Plate No. DOL-575, VIN: JT3GN86R740138705 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
US v. Landron-Cla
as 12-2112
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Claimant - Appellant: REYNALDO LANDRON-CLASS
Defendant: FARMACIA CARIMAS, Ave. Boulevard, Esquina Gautier Benitez EB-1, Levittown, Toa Baja, Puerto Rico, FARMACIA BONEVILLE, Ave. Degetau, A-17, Caguas, Puerto Rico, URB. VILLA DEL RIO ESTE, E-10, SECCION DOS RIOS, Catano, Puerto Rico and others
Claimant: BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, BANCO SANTANDER, S.A., RG MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
USA v. Lot of Assorted Scrapped 14kt. gold jewelry , et al.
as 3:2012cv01540
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Lot of Assorted Scrapped 14kt. gold jewelry, Lot of Ladies' Custom Jewelry, Ladies 14KT Gold Bracelet, 5.45DWT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
USA v. One 1993 33' Avanti (ERQ33266G993) et al
as 3:2011cv01464
Defendant: One 1993 33' Avanti (ERQ33266G993), Two 300 HP Yamaha Motor, One Garmin GPS and others
Plaintiff: USA
Claimant: Luis F Morales-Ayala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $17,811,379.02 Funds Seized as Follows: et al
as 3:2011cv01394
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $17,811,379.02 Funds Seized as Follows, A). $60,240.58 Funds Seized From, B). $2,964,085.93 Funds Seized from and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
US v. Landron-Class, et al
as 11-1360
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Claimant: AGUSTIN RIOS-RAMOS, BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, BANCO SANTANDER PUERTO RICO and others
Defendant: FARMACIA CARIMAS, Ave. Boulevard, Esquina Gautier Benitez EB-1, Levittown, Toa Baja, Puerto Rico, FARMACIA BONEVILLE, Ave. Degetau, A-17 Caguas, Puerto Rico, URB. VILLA DEL RIO ESTE, E-10, SECCION DOS RIOS, Catano, Puerto Rico and others
Claimant - Appellant: REYNALDO LANDRON-CLASS
United States of America v. 24,648/10 ounce plastic bottles, more or less, of an article of drug, labeled in part: (bottle) "***Bee-Shield***Hand Sanitizer INSTANT SANITIZING GEL***Kills 99.99% of Virus, Bacterias and et al
as 3:2010cv01530
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 24,648/10 ounce plastic bottles, more or less, of an article of drug, labeled in part: (bottle) "***Bee-Shield***Hand Sanitizer INSTANT SANITIZING GEL***Kills 99.99% of Virus, Bacterias and, 2,643/1 gallon plastic buckets, more or less, of an article of drug, labeled in part: (bucket) "***Bee-Shield***Hand Sanitizer INSTANT SANITIZING GEL***Kills 99.99% of Virus, Bacterias and F and 104/5 gallon unlabeled plastic buckets, more or less, of an article of drug purporting to be Bee-Shield hand sanitizer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?