Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Klaskin v. The MITRE Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv11452
Plaintiff:
Jill Klaskin
Defendant:
The MITRE Corporation, MITRE Board of Trustees, Jason Providakes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Gomes et al v. State Street Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10863
Plaintiff:
Kenneth N. Marenga, Eva M. Connors, Steven Peters and others
Defendant:
North America Regional Benefits Committee of State Street Corporation, State Street Corporation, Jane and John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Coviello et al v. BHS Management Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv30198
Defendant:
BHS Management Services, Inc., John Does 1-20 and The Board of Directors of BHS Management Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byrne, Matthew W. Coviello and Victoria Halsted
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wang v. Schroeter, et al
as 12-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUAN WANG
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN J. SCHROETER, RANDALL MACDONLAD, SAMUEL J. PALMISANO and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, JANE DOES 1-20, INTERNATIONAL BUISNESS MACHINES CORPORATION and others
Wang v. Schroeter et al
as 1:2011cv10009
Plaintiff:
Chuan Wang
Defendant:
Martin J. Schroeter, Randall MacDonald , Samuel J. Palmisano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dougan et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01682
Plaintiff:
Steffani Dougan, Tere Loubriel, Popular, Inc. USA 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and others
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Popular USA Benefits Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nashua Corporation Composite Pension Trust v. State Street Bank & Trust Company et al
as 1:2007cv12021
Defendant:
State Street Bank & Trust Company, State Street Global Advisors and John Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Nashua Corporation Composite Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
