Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Staples v. Colonial Traveler Motor Court, Inc et al
as 1:2015cv10079
Plaintiff:
Randy Staples
Defendant:
Colonial Traveler Motor Court, Inc, Michael DiPanni and Corinne DiPanni
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Cowern v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2014cv10123
Plaintiff:
Julie Cowern
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Staples Voluntary Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Price v Staples, Inc.
as 1:2009cv10008
Plaintiff:
Christopher Price
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fici, et al v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., et al
as 08-2323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL FICI PAUL FICI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED and ANTHONY P. BOREMI ANTHONY P. BOREMI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F ARIVELLA, LUCIEN F CARRIER, ELNORA M CURRAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES PENSION PLAN, LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN and others
Defendant:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA (CWA), LOCAL UNION 1365, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 1366 and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA
Ciotti v. Staples Inc.
as 1:2008cv11305
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ciotti
Defendant:
Staples Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Day v. Staples, Inc.
as 08-1689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN M DAY
Defendant - Appellee:
STAPLES, INC.
Arivella et al v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10398
Plaintiff:
William F Arivella, Lucien F. Carrier, Elnora M. Curran and others
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies, Inc., Lucent Technologies Pension Plan, Lucent Technologies Inc. Life Insurance Plans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
McCandless v. Staples, Inc.
as 1:2007cv11850
Plaintiff:
Kirsten McCandless , Lawrence Shluger and Duncan M Fairbrother
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
