Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv10265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union et al v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
as 1:2013cv11455
Plaintiff:
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union , Patrick F. Hogan , Timothy C. Brown and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Regional Transit Authority Transit Services, Inc. v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Worcester Local 22
as 4:2011cv40222
Plaintiff:
Regional Transit Authority Transit Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Worcester Local 22
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Regional Transit Authority Transit Services, Inc. v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Worcester Local 22
as 4:2010cv40156
Plaintiff:
Regional Transit Authority Transit Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Worcester Local 22
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
as 1:2009cv10679
Plaintiff:
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Nancy Driscoll and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Coach New England, LLC v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1512
as 3:2008cv30102
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1512
Plaintiff:
Coach New England, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Regional Transit Authority Transit Services,Inc. v. Amalgamated Transit Union Worcester Local 22
as 4:2007cv40221
Plaintiff:
Regional Transit Authority Transit Services,Inc., Regional Transit Authority Transit Services,Inc. and Regional Transit Authority Transit Services,Inc.
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union Worcester Local 22
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
