Cases 11 - 20 of 28
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10439
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10453
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv12517
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv12435
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ahold USA, Inc. v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv12225
Plaintiff:
Ahold USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Enright et al v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11660
Plaintiff:
Ellen Enright and William E Enright
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Schering-Plough Corp., et al
as 11-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCHERING CORPORATION, SCHERING PLOUGH CORP and WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Interested Party:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Schering-Plough Corp., et al
as 11-2264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant - Appellant:
SCHERING PLOUGH CORP, SCHERING CORPORATION and WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Interested Party:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc91079
Plaintiff:
The Medicines Company
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc., APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
