Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Gangi et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010mc10148
Plaintiff: Frank Gangi , Ferrous Miner Holdings, Ltd. , BABP VI LLC and others
Defendant: United States of America
Teleport v. Global NAPs, Inc.
as 1:2009cv11062
Plaintiff: Teleport Communications, Inc.
Defendant: Global NAPs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Type: Other Statutes None
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1309
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. MA Dept of Telecommunications, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant: 1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 09-1041
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant: 1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
: , , and others
Southern New England Telephone Company v. Global NAPs, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv12063
Plaintiff: Southern New England Telephone Company
Defendant: Global NAPs, Inc., Global NAPS New Hampshire, Inc., Global NAPS Networks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant
Southern New England Telephone Company v. Global Naps, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv12052
Plaintiff: Southern New England Telephone Company
Defendant: Global Naps, Inc., Global Naps New Hampshire, Inc., Global NAPS Networks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant
In re: Global Naps, Inc.,, et al
as 08-2509
Petitioner: In re: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
: , , and others
Southern New England Telephone Company v. Global Naps, Inc. et al
as 1:2008mc00081
Plaintiff: Southern New England Telephone Company
Defendant: Global Naps, Inc., Global NAPS New Hampshire, Inc., Global NAPS Networks, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?