Cases 21 - 30 of 34
US, et al v. Guidant Corporation, et al
as 12-1867
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF ARKANSAS, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEIDI HEINEMAN-GUTA, Relator
Defendant - Appellee:
GUIDANT CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Guidant Corporation
United States of America v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10896
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Arkansas, State of California and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Biogen Idec Inc.
as 1:2012cv10601
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Michael Bawduniak , State of California and others
Defendant:
Biogen Idec Inc.
Consolidated_plaintiff:
RTR Group, LLP , State of Connecticut, State of Washington and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Elan Corporation, PLC and Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rohn, et al v. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Cen, et al
as 11-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Plaintiff:
MILTON GREENE, CROSSROADS ACQUISITION CORP, WILLIAM M. PORTER and others
Defendant:
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party - Appellee:
DANA FARBER/HARVARD CANCER CENTER, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Interested Party:
SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 10-2494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party:
SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
United States of America et al v. ev3, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11822
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Jeffrey D'Agostino , John Doe and others
Defendant:
ev3, Inc. , John Hardin , Microtherapeutics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America ex. rel. Alex Booker and Edmund Hebron, et a.l v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11166
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2010cv11043
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
USA et al v. Guidant Corporation
as 1:2009cv11927
Plaintiff:
USA , State of Arkansas , State of California and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 09-1887
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROHN, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party:
SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
