Cases 31 - 40 of 156,591
Zherka v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv30077
Plaintiff:
Selim Zherka
Defendant:
Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Athens Program Insurance Services, LLC, NSM Insurance Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Conrad v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11463
Plaintiff:
Teresa Conrad
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
Rodriguez v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11464
Plaintiff:
Steven Rodriguez
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Earl v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11468
Plaintiff:
Angelo Earl
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cheatham v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11466
Plaintiff:
Earl Cheatham
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Durkin et al
as 1:2024cv11473
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Valerie Durkin and John Durkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elliott v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11469
Plaintiff:
Loretta Elliott
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dunlap v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2024cv11462
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Respondent:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
