Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sandoval v. Chertoff, et al
as 08-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANCY C. SANDOVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, DENIS C. RIORDAN, Director USCIS Boston District Office, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, Director of the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Nabavi v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv11719
Plaintiff:
Seyed Mahmoud Nabavi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and Denis C. Riordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv10826
Plaintiff:
Carmen Maria Garcia Smith
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Demidov v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10723
Plaintiff:
Andrey Demidov
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
