Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Santiago-Arzola et al v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company
as 3:2010cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jose Oscar Santiago-Arzola, Jose Medina-Medina, Myrna Mayoral-de Jesus and others
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Insurance Company X,Y,Z and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Abreu Rodriguez et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) et al
as 3:2009cv01951
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Abreu Rodriguez, LUIS M ALGARIN RODRIGUEZ, Saura Gonzalez Carrion and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and CRAIG FUGATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Velasquez v. Holder
as 09-1324
Petitioner:
JESUS A. VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Velasquez-Martino
as 3:2008cv01532
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Leonor Velasquez-Martino
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Munoz-Camacho et al
as 3:2007cv01293
Plaintiff:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Santos Javier Munoz-Camacho, Josefina Aviles-Escabi, Conjugal Partnership Munoz-Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Miletti-Martinez et al v. Rotor Hawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01184
Plaintiff:
Jose Miletti-Martinez, Jose Alberto Miletti-Martinez, Carlos Miletti-Martinez and others
Defendant:
Rotor Hawk Industries, Inc., John Doe and Insurance Companies A,B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Delpin-Aponte, et al v. Potter, et al
as 3:2002cv01787
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Serrano-Serrano, Ada Caraballo, Carlos D. Santiago and others
Defendant:
Roberto Perez-De-Leon, John E. Potter and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
