Cases 41 - 50 of 84
US v. Chevres-Motta
as 13-1920
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL CHEVRES-MOTTA, a/k/a Tito Pastor, a/k/a Penco, a/k/a Gavilan, t/n Manuel Antonio Cheveres Motta
US v. Almonte-Nunez
as 13-1896
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWIN OMAR ALMONTE-NUNEZ, t/n Edwin Almonte-Nunez
US v. Velez-Montalvo
as 13-1843
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO VELEZ-MONTALVO, t/n Eduardo Enrique Velez-Montalvo, a/k/a Edu, a/k/a Doggie
Ouch, et al v. FNMA, et al
as 13-1209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEANG OUCH, DIEU TRUONG, VITH CHRORM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a FNMA, a/k/a Fannie Mae, INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES, a/k/a Indymac Bank, F.S.B., ONEWEST BANK, FSB and others
Defendant:
IMB MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LP, DUNE CAPITAL, LLC, J.C. FLOWERS & CO. and others
US v. Colon-Ledee
as 13-1078
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDGARDO COLON-LEDEE, t/n Edgardo Miguel Colon-Ledee
US v. Adorno-Molina
as 13-1065
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MARVA ADORNO-MOLINA, t/n Marva Lee Adorno-Molina
Interested Party:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., POPULAR AUTO, ABNLLYS VAZQUEZ and others
US v. Vizcarrondo-Cartagena
as 12-2467
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
OMY VIZCARRONDO-CARTAGENA, t/n Omi Vizcarrondo-Cartagena
US v. Vizcarrondo-Cartagena
as 12-2468
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
OMY VIZCARRONDO-CARTAGENA, t/n Omi Vizcarrondo-Cartagena
US v. Pomales-Lebron
as 12-1241
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDGAR POMALES-LEBRON, a/k/a Edgardo Oscar Pomales-Lebron, t/n Edgar Oscar Pomales-Lebron
Nora M. Barraford v. T&N Limited et al
as 1:2012cv10013
Defendant:
T&N Limited and TAF International Limited
Plaintiff:
Nora M. Barraford and The Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
