Cases 51 - 60 of 62
RHOADES v. DAVOL, INC., et al
as 1:2009cv02943
Plaintiff:
CINDY L. RHOADES and ROBERT J. RHOADES
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sierson v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02882
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Sierson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANZIKOS et al v. CR BARD INC et al
as 1:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
JAMES LANZIKOS and MARYANN LANZIKOS
Defendant:
CR BARD INC and DAVOL INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kardes v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02788
Plaintiff:
Robert Kardes, Robert Kardes and Robert Kardes
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bradley et al v. CR Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02664
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Bradley and Ruby Bradley
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Shelton v. CR Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02663
Plaintiff:
Richard Shelton
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CR Quality Roofing of PR, Inc et al v. Dickinson et al
as 3:2008cv02192
Plaintiff:
CR Quality Roofing of PR, Inc and Carlos Ramos-Ruiz
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson, Insurance Co. ABC and John Doe Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wilkinson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02595
Plaintiff:
Brenda Wilkinson, Brenda Wilkinson and Brenda Wilkinson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02596
Plaintiff:
Susan Anthony, Susan Anthony and Susan Anthony
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plante v. Embrey
as 08-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY DANA PLANTE, d/b/a Land Plan Associates
Defendant - Appellee:
ARLENE M. EMBREY, d/b/a Moneta Capital Corporation Receiver for: The U.S. Small Business Administration and The Former CR Amusements, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
