Cases 51 - 60 of 1,476
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Colon-Rodriguez v. American Federation of Government Employees et al
as 3:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
Edwin Colon-Rodriguez
Defendant:
American Federation of Government Employees, Insurance Company XYZ, Company ABC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
US v. Rosa-Colon
as 23-1594
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWIN ROSA-COLON, a/k/a Glock
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Maria et al v. Colon et al
as 3:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
Natanael Maria, Lorenzo Maria and Matea Roman
Defendant:
Hector Emilio Colon, Tamara Babilonia, COLON-BABILONIA CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
US v. Ortiz-Colon
as 23-1504
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO XAVIER ORTIZ-COLON
Ramirez-Cedeno v. Torres-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Michael L Ramirez-Cedeo and Michael L. Ramirez-Cedeno
Defendant:
Dr. Leonardo Torres-Rodriguez, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Torres-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
