Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 114
United States of America v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10896
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Arkansas, State of California and others
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
House of Flavors, Inc. v. TFG-Michigan, L.P. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1398
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOUSE OF FLAVORS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: TFG-MICHIGAN, L.P.
United States of America et al v. Biogen Idec Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10601
Plaintiff: United States of America , Michael Bawduniak , State of California and others
Defendant: Biogen Idec Inc.
Consolidated_plaintiff: RTR Group, LLP , State of Connecticut, State of Washington and others
Consolidated_defendant: Elan Corporation, PLC and Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Millennium Laboratories, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10132
Plaintiff: Ryan Uehling, Mark McGuire, State of California and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Wendy Johnson and State of Washington
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Georgia
Consolidated Defendant: Millenium Laboratories of California, Inc., James Slattery and Howard Appel
Defendant: Millennium Laboratories, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: Omni Healthcare Inc. and John Doe
Interested Party: Allstate Insurance Company and Lawrence K. Spitz, M.D.
Cross Defendant: Amadeo Pesce and Estate of Robert Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Winkelman et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv11398
Plaintiff: Myron Winkelman , Stephani Leflore , United States of America and others
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation , Caremark RX, Inc. , Caremark PCS llc and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Warner Chilcott We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv11143
Plaintiff: United States of America , California, State of , Connecticut, State of and others
Defendant: Warner Chilcott, Warner Chilcott PLC , Warner Chilcott Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Companion Health Services v. Majors Mobility, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1657
Plaintiff - Appellant: COMPANION HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: MAJORS MOBILITY, INC., a Michigan Corporation, MAJORS MEDICAL, INC., a Michigan Corporation, MMS NORTHERN DETROIT, INC., a Michigan Corporation and others
Defendant: STUART SHERMAN, JACOB & WEINGARTEN, P.C. and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Companion Health Services v. Kurtz, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1493
Plaintiff - Appellee: COMPANION HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: GEORGE KURTZ and MARY KAY REID
Defendant: MAJORS MOBILITY, INC., a Michigan Corporation, MAJORS MEDICAL, INC., a Michigan Corporation, MMS NORTHERN DETROIT, INC., a Michigan corporation and others
US, et al v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 11-1336
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID M. KAMMERER
Defendant - Appellee: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ALZA CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Interested Party: PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Vazquez-Colon et al v. Deng et al
as 3:2011cv01006
Plaintiff: Alberto Vazquez-Colon , Hilda Pineiro , Maria Del Pilar Vazquez-Colon and others
Defendant: Di Deng, AAA Michigan, Companies A, B and C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?