Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Wojcicki v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2011cv40175
Plaintiff:
Margaret S Wojcicki
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Haag v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv11591
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Haag
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Massachusetts Port Authority v. Lalama Electrical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11014
Defendant:
Lalama Electrical Contractors, Inc., Internal Revenue Service, Rockland Trust Company and others
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Port Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Elliott v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv10627
Respondent:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Kenneth A. Elliott
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Elliott v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011mc91086
Petitioner:
Kenneth A. Elliott
Respondent:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv30083
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Souza et al
as 1:2011cv10400
Plaintiff:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
Mark D Souza, Chase Home Finance LLC, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
DeVellis v. Colantuoni et al
as 1:2011cv10293
Plaintiff:
James DeVellis
Defendant:
Dean Colantuoni, Internal Revenue Service , Michael John Brandano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
S&S Aviation Services, Inc. v. Key Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv10094
Plaintiff:
S&S Aviation Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Key Financial Services, Inc., Matthew Haggerty, N.H. Helicopters, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
