Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Elmachtoub, et al v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 15-1491
Plaintiff:
NABIL ELMACHTOUB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JAMES L. BURCH, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BRADLEY, PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HARVEY J. BERGER, FRANK G. HALUSKA and others
Defendant:
DAVID E. I. PYOTT, MIKE R. BOWLIN, JOHN T. CARDIS and others
Movant:
JOSEPH MASSAGLIA, KENNETH CANAWAY, ERSTE-SPARINVEST KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT M. B. H. and others
Elmachtoub v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv13109
Plaintiff:
Nabil Elmachtoub
Defendant:
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Harvey J. Berger , Frank G. Haluska and others
Movant:
William A. Gaul, D.M.D. , Joseph Bradley , City of Fort Lauderdale Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv13082
Plaintiff:
Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Defendant:
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Harvey J. Berger , Timothy P. Clackson and others
Movant:
William A. Gaul, D.M.D. , Joseph Bradley , City of Fort Lauderdale Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Automotive Industries Pension v. Textron Inc., et al
as 11-2106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION TRUST FUND AND THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
Plaintiff:
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXTRON INC., LEWIS B. CAMPBELL, TED R. FRENCH and others
Interested Party:
CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
