Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SULLIVAN et al v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GREGORY B SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, JUDGE DOMINIC PILEGGI, EEOC PHILADELPHIA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CSX Transportation, Inc., et al v. SMART-Transp. Div., et al
as 19-1138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY, CO., NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MECHANICAL DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT, TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Defendant:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES
Firemen's Insurance Company of Washington, D.C. v. ACE Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv10129
Defendant:
ACE Insurance Company, Aerotek, Inc. and Thomas J. Story
Plaintiff:
Firemen's Insurance Company of Washington, D.C.
Interested Party:
MP Masonry Inc., Joseph F. Holguin, Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Firemen's Insurance Company of Washington, D.C. v. Arbella Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv10254
Plaintiff:
Firemen's Insurance Company of Washington, D.C.
Defendant:
Arbella Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CSX Transportation, Inc., et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant - Appellant:
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT, TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Healey v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al
as 16-2171
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Intervenor:
TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, MECHANICAL DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN and others
Cook & Co. Ins. Serv. Inc. v. Volunteer Firemen's Ins. Serv.
as 15-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COOK & COMPANY INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Cook & Company Insurance Services, Inc. v. Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv12342
Plaintiff:
Cook & Company Insurance Services, Inc. and Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook & Company Insurance Services, Inc. v. Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services, Inc.
as 1:2014cv14384
Plaintiff:
Cook & Company Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Boston Scientific Corp., et al
as 09-8014
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PONTIAC, City of Pontiac Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System, ROBERT L. GARBER, Individually, and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, JACK YOPP, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Petitioner:
LAWRENCE C. BEST, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, FREDERICUS A. COLEN and others
:
, and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
