Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gonzalez Tomasini v. DeJoy, et al
as 23-1914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO GONZALEZ-TOMASINI and ORLANDO GONZALEZ TOMASINI
Plaintiff:
JULIETTE IRIZARRY-MIRANDA, K O G, V D R and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster and US POSTAL SERVICE
US v. Faucette
as 22-1564
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MARKEVIN FAUCETTE, a/k/a Kevin Faucette, a/k/a Mark Faucette, a/k/a G, a/k/a Giz, a/k/a Big Boy
US v. Faucette
as 20-2105
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MARKEVIN FAUCETTE, a/k/a Kevin Faucette, a/k/a Mark Faucette, a/k/a G, a/k/a Giz, a/k/a Big Boy
US v. Murchison
as 20-1970
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GLENN MURCHISON, a/k/a G, a/k/a Squeeze
US v. Gomez
as 20-1786
Defendant / Appellant:
DUANE GOMEZ, a/k/a Go-Go, a/k/a G
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Gomez
as 20-1727
Defendant / Appellant:
DUANE GOMEZ, a/k/a Go-Go, a/k/a G
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Violette
as 19-1413
Interested Party:
GENERAL MILLS, INC., NORTH CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE, CUNA MUTUAL INSURANCE SOCIETY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY P. VIOLETTE, Gregory Violette, Gregory Paul Violette, G. Violette, G. P. Violette, Paul G. Violette, Paul E. Violette, Paul Gregory Violette, P. G. Violette and GREGORY P. VIOLETTE, a/k/a Gregory Violette, a/k/a Gregory Paul Violette, a/k/a G. Violette, a/k/a G. P. Violette, a/k/a Paul G. Violette, a/k/a Paul E. Violette, a/k/a Paul Gregory Violette, a/k/a P. G. Violette
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Whiting
as 16-1369
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRYL WHITING, a/k/a G, a/k/a God, a/k/a Rah
US v. Faucette
as 15-2102
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MARKEVIN FAUCETTE, a/k/a Kevin Faucette, a/k/a Mark Faucette, a/k/a G, a/k/a Giz, a/k/a Big Boy
US v. Murchison
as 15-1113
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
GLENN MURCHISON, a/k/a G, a/k/a Squeeze
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
