Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rogers v. Nancy-Christine, Inc.
as 1:2023cv12580
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Nancy-Christine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Yourfavorite.com et al v. Synapse Product Development, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv11211
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers and Yourfavorite.com
Defendant:
Hillary Quirk and Synapse Product Development, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10791
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Yourfavorite.com et al v. Federation of Exchange Accomodators et al
as 1:2020cv10649
Defendant:
Lynn Harkin, Toija J. Beutler, Andrew Gustafson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers and Yourfavorite.com
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rogers et al v. SSNet, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10289
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers and Yourfavorite.com
Defendant:
SSNet, Inc., VCheck Solutions and Thomas J Walker
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wilkins v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2017cv00454
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Richard Roger Wilkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Ashe
as 3:2013cv30055
Petitioner:
Richard Rogers
Respondent:
Michael Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Ashe et al
as 3:2012cv30188
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Ashe and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. CityGrid Media, LLC
as 1:2011cv12243
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
CityGrid Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Rogers v. Boston Pads, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv11890
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Swann, Lakeya Rochelle, Gustavo Payano and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
