Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. Pontes et al
as 1:2018cv10037
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
Gilberto Pontes, Liberio Feliz, Manuel Amaral and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CrossFit, Inc. v. Mustapha
as 16-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CROSSFIT, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNY MUSTAPHA, individually, d/b/a Chelmsford Sports Club
Defendant:
DALE SURAN, CrossFit, Inc., General Counsel, WILLIAM LEXNER, d/b/a CrossFit Boost, CHRIS COOPER, individually and as Regional Media Director for CrossFit, Inc., d/b/a CrossFit Catalyst and others
CrossFit, Inc. v. Mustapha
as 16-1987
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CROSSFIT, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
DONNY MUSTAPHA, individually and, d/b/a Chelmsford Sports Club, RONNIE BRIERE, individually and, d/b/a CrossFit Objective, CHRIS COOPER, individually and as Regional Media Director for CrossFit, Inc., d/b/a CrossFit Catalyst and others
Premier Sports Inc. v. Correia et al
as 1:2014cv13822
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Antonio Correia, Luis Sousa, Mario Tavares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company v. Snake River Sporting Club Development Company, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv13043
Plaintiff:
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company
Defendant:
Snake River Sporting Club Development Company, LLC, Snake River Sporting Club, Inc., Dean Gary A. Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
CrossFit, Inc. v. Mustapha et al
as 1:2013cv11498
Plaintiff:
CrossFit, Inc.
Defendant:
Donny Mustapha and Chelmsford Sports Club
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company v. Boyce et al
as 1:2012cv12171
Plaintiff:
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company
Defendant:
Dean Charles Boyce, British Caribbean Bank Limited, Ambergris Cay Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
