Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wang et al v. Mhathre et al
as 4:2023cv40055
Plaintiff:
Xing F Wang, 3W Consulting Company and Kathleen P Lee
Defendant:
Nitin J. Mhathre, Seth R Grossman, Robert Marchard and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Cheung Hing Digital Limited v. Wu et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Defendant:
Hai Xing Qiao, Guangwei "William" Wu, Starfish Bridge Express and others
Plaintiff:
Cheung Hing Digital Limited
Trustee:
TD Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chen et al
as 1:2019cv12127
Defendant:
Yong Yang, Linlin Wu, Jiafeng Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Li v. Fu Hing Main Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10670
Plaintiff:
Sam Li
Defendant:
Fu Hing Main Restaurant Inc., Man Chee Li and Jia Xing Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Huang et al v. DGC Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10096
Plaintiff:
Xing-Fang Huang , Zhi-Fang Han and Guang-He Liu
Defendant:
DGC Restaurant, Inc. , Stephen Dong and Xiaomei Guan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chen v. Holder
as 09-1264
Petitioner:
XING LUN CHEN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
HOULTON SHOPPING CENTER ASSOCIATES LLC v. WING XING SHENG INC et al
as 1:2008cv00393
Plaintiff:
HOULTON SHOPPING CENTER ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant:
WING XING SHENG INC , WING XING WANG LLC , HUI LIAN TAN and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
