Cases 131 - 140 of 4,079
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff:
ADAM STREGE
Defendant:
GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
Lawrence v. Garland, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Glendening, et al v. Howard, et al
as 24-3005
Plaintiff:
JESSICA GLENDENING, as next friend of G.W., AUDRA ASHER, as next friend of L.P., COLIN SHAW, as next friend of C.B. and N.K. and others
Defendant:
LAURA HOWARD, Secretary of Kansas Department of Aging and Disability Services, in her officie capacity, MIKE DIXON, State Hospitals Commissioner, in his official capacity and LINDSEY DINKEL, Larned State Hospital Superintendent, in her official capacity
Watson v. Ebert, et al
as 24-3007
Plaintiff:
CARL E. WATSON
Defendant:
SHERYL A. EBERT and VETERANS EVALUATION SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kahler v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 24-1023
Plaintiff:
MARY LEE KAHLER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., AKA Walmart, Inc.
Vaughn v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al
as 24-1016
Plaintiff:
JEANETTA VAUGHN
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., a corporation, DBA Chase Bank and TRINA PELECH, an individual
Williams v. Cache County, et al
as 24-4015
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, an individual
Defendant:
CACHE COUNTY, a public politic, D. CHAD JENSEN, individually and in his official capacity as Cache County Sheriff, LOWER FOODS, a Utah corporation and others
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3038
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
