Cases 121 - 130 of 175
Barron v. People of the State Colorado, et al
as 10-1344
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAVONE B. BARRON
Respondent - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Mujahid v. Wiley, et al
as 10-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALIF ABDUL QAUI MUJAHID, AKA Keith E. Gaffney
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WILEY, Warden, CHRISTOPHER B. SYNSVOLL, Legal Supervisor, THERESA MONTOYA, Senior Attorney and others
Berryhill v. Henry, et al
as 10-7056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, T. BASS-LESURE, Oklahoma County Judge, VIRGIL C. BLACK, Oklahoma County Judge and others
Riches v. Readers Digest
as 10-1304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, DBA Bernard Madoff, AKA Bernie Madoff
Defendant - Appellee:
READERS DIGEST, d/b/a The Readers Digest Association Inc., et al.,
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Hatten v. Freeborn, et al
as 10-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ISAAC FREEBORN, MARNE BOYLE, A. MERRITT and others
Rocha v. CCCF Administration, et al
as 10-1158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO A. ROCHA
Defendant - Appellee:
CCCF ADMINISTRATION, D. SMELSER, CCCF Warden, R. GARCIA, CCCF Personnel and others
Solazzo v. Marshall, et al
as 10-1153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW VITO SOLAZZO, a/k/a ANDREW V. SOLAZZO, a/k/a ANDREW SOLAZZO
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE MARSHALL, CORY B. TENBRINK, SUSAN WOODARD and others
Martinez v. Davi
as 10-1092
Petitioner - Appellant:
LORENZO DELIO MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
B. DAVIS, Warden
Hatten v. Holland, et al
as 10-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND, R. ANDERT, SARA REVELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
