Cases 21 - 30 of 177
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Requena v. Sheridan, et al
as 17-3096
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Defendant - Appellee:
G. SHERIDAN, CCII Unit Team, in his individual and official capacity, A. FLORY, Librarian, in her individual and official capacity, D. LANGFORD, Deputy Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Hill v. Revell, et al
as 17-1138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director, JACK FOX, Warden, B. SANDOVAL, Correctional Officer and others
Sweat v. Rickards, et al
as 17-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALREE B. SWEAT, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DET. JEFF FERGUSEN, DEMING POLICE OFC. Z. ZIGMON, DET. MIKE RICKARDS and others
Gorbey v. Watts, et al
as 16-3371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, D. S. DODRILL, M. K. NALLEY and others
Raines v. Fox
as 16-6338
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAINES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B. FOX, Warden
Sweat v. City of Las Cruces, et al
as 16-2218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALREE B. SWEAT, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAS CRUCES, JAIME MONTOYA, MIRANDA BAKER, Officer and others
Custard v. Allred, et al
as 16-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB ALLEN CUSTARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ALLRED, YVETTE BROUILLET-FETTERHOFF, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Pinson v. Berkebile
as 16-1347
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. BERKEBILE
Hill v. CCA, et al
as 16-1299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT B. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, LOUIS CABILING, M.D., LYNNE M. THOMPSON, N.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
