Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Davis v. United States, et al
as 24-3045
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, City of Washington, District of Columbia, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. and others
Davis v. United States, et al
as 24-3027
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, City of Washington, District of Columbia, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. and others
Srader v. United States, et al
as 24-3001
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A. SRADER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, FNU LNU (1) and others
Rowland v. Matevousian, et al
as 23-1411
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND
Defendant:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Regional Director of the North Central Regional Office of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, WILLIAM TRUE, Warden of FCI Florence, SHARI HIMLIE, Health Service Administrator, FCI Florence; JOHN DOES 1-5; JANE DOES 1-5; and others
Rowland v. Matevousian, et al
as 23-1343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Regional Director of the North Central Regional Office of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, WILLIAM TRUE, Warden of FCI Florence, SHARI HIMLIE, Health Service Administrator, FCI Florence; JOHN DOES 1-5; JANE DOES 1-5; and others
Smith v. United States, et al
as 23-1218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
A. TRUJILLO and GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNIDENTIFIED CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
Askew v. United States
as 23-3046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEON HENDERSON ASKEW
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY OF LEAVENWORTH, GREGORY LNU, Health Services, USP Leavenworth, UNKNOWN STAFF, USP Leavenworth and others
Burnham v. The United States, et al
as 22-1436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES, STATE OF COLORADO, GORDON P. GALLAGHER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
