Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Morris, et al v. OK Depart. of Human Services, et al
as 10-6241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY MORRIS and GLENDA MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, State of Oklahoma, HOWARD H. HENDRICK, Director of Oklahoma Department of Human Services, OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. and others
Edwards-Flynn v. Yara, et al
as 10-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET D. EDWARDS-FLYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL ANN YARA, MATTHEW SANDOVAL, HENRY O. SANCHEZ and others
Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. Morris, et al
as 09-2296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COPAR PUMICE CO., INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ALLAN MORRIS, DAVIS YANTOS, MARY UHL and others
Edwards-Flynn v. Sandoval, et al
as 09-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET D. EDWARDS-FLYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW SANDOVAL, HENRY O. SANCHEZ, JOHN AVILA and others
Defendant:
CHERYL ANN YARA
Segler v. Felfam Ltd. Partnership, et al
as 08-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVIA A. SEGLER
Defendant - Appellee:
FELFAM LTD. PARTNERSHIP, LEVY, MORSE & WHEELER, P.C., ROBERT S. HYATT, individually and in his official capacity as District Court Judge of Denver District Court and others
Morris, et al v. Hilldale Public Schools, et al
as 08-7104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MORRIS, J.M., a minor, by and through her parent and next friend and REBECCA MORRIS, J.M., a minor, by and through her parent and next friend
Defendant - Appellant:
HILLDALE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I-29, of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, AKA Hilldale Public Schools and BRIAN GIACOMO
Hafen v. Carter, et al
as 08-4007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL G. HAFEN
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CARTER, Director of Sitla and MICHAEL MORRIS, Chairman of Sitla
Phillips v. Humble, et al
as 08-3004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA L PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
JO HUMBLE, Chief of Police, NFN BRADLEY, SABRINA GETTLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
