Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,090
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-8031
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armendariz, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff: JACQUELINE ARMENDARIZ and CHINOOK CENTER
Defendant: CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, DANIEL SUMMEY, in his individual capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Joplin v. Capstone Real Estate Services
as 24-2077
Plaintiff: PAMELA KAY JOPLIN
Defendant: CAPSTONE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1202
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manning v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 24-5058
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MANNING, as the Administrator of the Estate of Terence Crutcher, Sr.
Defendant: CITY OF TULSA and BETTY JO SHELBY
Marshall v. Bacon, et al
as 24-2076
Plaintiff: VICTOR R. MARSHALL
Defendant: C. SHANNON BACON, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New Mexico, MIKE HAMMAN, State Engineer of the State of New Mexico, ROLF SCHMIDT-PETERSEN, Director of the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission and others
Chang v. Rout, et al
as 24-1195
Plaintiff: MENG UOY CHANG
Defendant: DAVID ROUT, HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC., MURPHY CENTER LLC and others
K. A. v. Barnes, et al
as 24-1188
Plaintiff: K. A.
Defendant: MICHELLE BARNES, in her official capacity, ARAPAHOE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF CHILD AND ADULT PROTECTION SERVICES,, MICHELLE DOSSEY, in her official capacity and others
Perry v. Encore at Blvd One LLC, et al
as 24-1189
Plaintiff: SHANNON LEE PERRY
Defendant: ENCORE AT BLVD. ONE, LLC, RICCI DONATI, JESSICA BRANDL and others
Sladek v. Bank of America, NA, et al
as 24-1181
Plaintiff: DENNIS SLADEK
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, NA, a North Carolina corporation, U.S. BANK, a Minnesota corporation, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, a Utah corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?