Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Castillo v. Fierros, et al
as 15-2049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES CASTILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNETTE MARIE FIERROS, JOSEPH JOHN CASTRO and JIM RODRIGUEZ
United States v. Garcia-Rodriguez
as 15-8003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HERIBERTO GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
Warner, et al v. Gross, et al
as 14-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES F. WARNER, BENJAMIN R. COLE, by and through his next friend Robert S. Jackson, JOHN M. GRANT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ, NICHOLAS A. DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN J. GROSS, MICHAEL W. ROACH, STEVE BURRAGE and others
Defendant:
H-UNIT SECTION CHIEF X and JOHN DOE EXECUTIONERS #1-10
Movant:
ZIVA BRANSTETTER
United States v. Rodriguez
as 14-6123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ
United States v. Garcia-Rodriguez
as 13-8031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HERIBERTO GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
United States, et al v. Rodriguez-Valdez
as 12-2185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN EDEL RODRIGUEZ-VALDEZ
Mata Rodriguez v. United State
as 11-3297
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN MATA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez-Aguirre v. Garcia
as 11-1420
Petitioner - Appellant:
GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ-AGUIRRE
Respondent - Appellee:
RENE G. GARCIA
Rodriguez v. Ledezma
as 11-6118
Petitioner - Appellant:
ONELIO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
H.A. LEDEZMA, Warden
Rodriguez v. Daniels, et al
as 11-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANIELS, Warden, USP Florence, "John Doe #1," Special Investigations Agent, USP Florence, "John Doe #2," Special Investigations Specialist, USP Florence, L.J. MILUSNIC, Assistant Warden, ADX Florence and D. SPROUL, Step-Down Program Unit Manager, ADX Florence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
