Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hale v. The GEO Group, et al
as 13-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., N.M. CORRS. DEP'T, ISSAC GUERRA and others
Gatlin v. Holdridge, et al
as 13-1087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTWAN OCIE GATLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY HOLDRIDGE, Correctional Officer, STEVE BROWN, SR., Investigator, JESSICA JARAMILLIO, Correctional Officer and others
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Knox v. Pink-Roberts, et al
as 09-7082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTA PINK-ROBERTS, DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, NEAMYRA RIDDLE and others
Anthony Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent, et al
as 09-3204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a municipal corporation, adjunct and political division of Kansas, CAROL J. BACON, JANE AND JOHN DOES and others
Riches v. Hooker, et al
as 09-8065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a as Bernard Madoff
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. HOOKER, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, PROJECT SAFE CHILDHOOD and others
Riches v. Hooker, et al
as 09-8065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a as Bernard Madoff
Defendant - Appellee:
T. J. HOOKER, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, PROJECT SAFE CHILDHOOD and others
Davis v. Kansas State Board, et al
as 09-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a Municipal Corporation, Adjunct and Political Subdivision of Kansas, JOHN AND JANE DOES A-Z, Public Defenders/Administrators, individually and as employees to Kansas State Board of Indigents Defense Services, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Kansas, JESSICA R. KUHEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
