Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Rosales v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL L. ROSALES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Director of D.O.C., L. REID, Centennial Correctional Facility (CCF_, WATKINS, Case Manager (CCF) and others
Snyder v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1128
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN GLENN SNYDER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
West v. Denver County Jail Warden, et al
as 08-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
DENVER COUNTY JAIL WARDEN, DENVER RECEPTION & DIAGNOSTIC WARDEN, SGT. HARRIS, D.R.D.C. Infirmary and others
West v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, CARL ZENON, Four Mile Correctional Center - Warden, RON LEYBA, Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility - Warden and others
Griffin v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES GRIFFIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Mr., Director of Correction, JAMES ABBOTT, Mr., Warden of C.T.C.F., JOHN SUTHERS, Mr., Attorney General and others
Baldauf v. Garoutte, et al
as 07-1452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD BALDAUF
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCES GAROUTTE, EUGENE E. ATHERTON, JOHN STONER and others
Tivis v. Beecroft, et al
as 07-1453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL KEITH TIVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATTY BEECROFT, MD, RON LEYBA, (Warden) and JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director
Lee v. Ortiz, et al
as 07-1447
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN LEE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, AL ESTEP, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Whitington v. Ortiz, et al
as 07-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WHITINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, AL ESTEP, SGT. OLSEN and others
Groll v. Johnson, et al
as 07-1332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINIC GROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY LEE JOHNSON and JOE ORTIZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
