Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Whitmore v. Mask, et al
as 13-6258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CLARK, Grievance Coordinator, DAVID MILLER, Warden and DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee
Defendant:
MINDY MASK, Inmate Trust Fund Supervisor
Blackman v. Clark
as 13-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BLACKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN CLARK, Lieutenant, ADX Florence, Colorado
Clark v. Oakley, et al
as 13-6205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL OAKLEY and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Sherratt v. Utah Department of Corrections, et al
as 13-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UTAH STATE PRISON, UTAH CONTRACT ATTORNEYS and others
Ali v. Jones, et al
as 13-6093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MURTAZA ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, BOBBY BOONE, Deputy Director, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee and others
Jackson v. Soper, et al
as 13-4052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA SOPER, RN - Registered Nurse, JONI J. JONES, WAYNE A. FREESTONE and others
Banks v. City of Lakewood, et al
as 13-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORREY V. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, (Supervisor) Lakewood Police Dept., OFFICER JANE DOE, Lakewood Police Dept., OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, Lakewood Police Dept. and others
Clark v. Oakley, et al
as 13-6054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL OAKLEY and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clark v. Oakley, et al
as 13-6050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL OAKLEY and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Brown v. Kern, et al
as 13-3048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARON KERN, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Office, (FNU) CLARK, MARC BENNETT, District Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
