Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Kristich v. Casady, et al
as 24-6107
Plaintiff:
ORIN KRISTICH
Defendant:
FNU CASADY, Nurse, in official and individual capacity, FNU FOSTER, Nurse, in official and individual capacity, FNU CRANE, Dr., MD, in official and individual capacity and others
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR MOORE
Defendant:
DR. HODGE, (CSP), MARSHALL GRIFFITH, (CSP) and WARDEN LITTLE
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 23-1209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR JAMES MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. HODGE, CARLY REY-HAYES, MARSHALL GRIFFITH and others
Johnson v. Sanders, et al
as 23-7031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONE M. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. SANDERS, RAY LARIMER, ERNESTO MARTINEZ and others
Clay v. Lares, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLEOUS DARRELL CLAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. L. LARES, DR. RUDOLPH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Noe v. United States Government, et al
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GEORGE NOE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, BERKLEY, Dr., H. SCHOUWEILER and others
Garcia v. Harrigan, et al
as 22-1444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER T. HARRIGAN, DR., MS. C. LINDGREN, HSA, JOHN MCGAUGH, MAT and others
Melnick v. Williams, et al
as 22-1386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNTER ADAM MELNICK
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director of Prisons, in his official capacity, SARAH BUTLER, Dr., Chief of Psychiatry, in her individual and official capacities, CPO MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
POLIS, Governor and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
