Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Randall v. Utah Board of Pardons & Parole
as 24-4069
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHAD RANDALL
Defendant:
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE
Throneberry v. Nunn
as 23-6165
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL DUANE THRONEBERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN, Warden
Christensen v. Crow
as 22-6052
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN RANDALL CHRISTENSEN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW
Randall v. Allbaugh
as 16-5109
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYLER WELCH RANDALL
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE M. ALLBAUGH, Interim Director
Davis v. Newton, et al
as 16-3207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH R. NEWTON, Assistant Public Defender and RANDALL REYNOLDS, Detective, Wichita Police Department
Green v. Sirmons, et al
as 15-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, OSP, DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, Unit ManagerOSP, A. LIGHTLE, Deputy Warden-OSP and others
Berryhill v. LaGrange, et al
as 14-6156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
VICKI MILES LAGRANGE, U.S. District Judge, LEE R. WEST, District Director, U.S. District Judge, ROBIN CAUTHRON, District Director, U.S. District Judge and others
Berryhill v. OK DOC Board Members, et al
as 14-6155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY, MARTY SIRMONS, Warden and others
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Arney, et al v. Hayden, et al
as 14-3107
Plaintiff:
RICKEY RAY REDFORD, ROBERT DEMASS, THOMAS H. PORTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND ROBERTS, CHARLES E. SIMMONS and BILL GRAVES
Movant To Intervene:
THOMAS ODELL KELLY and KENNETH JACKSON
Movant To Intervene - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LEEK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
