Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Johnson v. Moore, et al
as 21-1054
Defendant / Appellee:
BOOK, DALTON, KYLE MOORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Williams, et al
as 21-1058
Defendant / Appellee:
CASADY, CHAD, KILPOLITES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Little, et al
as 21-1042
Defendant / Appellee:
SHOEMAKER, CHAD, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Warrence v. Obama, et al
as 14-1279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIKOS WARRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, US President, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US Justice Department, as an entity and all individual members driected policy and green-lighting Nazi book-burning, felony intimidation with the threat of violence and death, infinite facistactions n the part of any g, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, US SUPREME COURT, as an entity (memebers followall sent via USPS notification) and others
Wilson v. Montano, et al
as 12-2051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL WILSON, SR.
Plaintiff:
JESSE ORTIZ, OSCAR LEYVA, PATRICK MARQUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE MONTANO, Deputy, FRED TORRES, Deputy, JOE CHAVEZ, Warden and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, VCDC booking officer or employee, MARTIN BENAVIDEZ, Officer, MIKE CHAVEZ, former Chief of Police and others
Jackson v. Enforcer of Const. Policy, et al
as 10-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRIGINAL D. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ENFORCER OF CONSTITUTIONAL POLICY, RESPECTLY INJUNCTIVABLE PARTY, LT. VIGOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peterson, et al v. Grisham, et al
as 08-7100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM N. PETERSON, GARY ROGERS and MELVIN HETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN GRISHAM, DOUBLEDAY BROADWAY PUBLISHING GROUP, RANDOM HOUSE, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
