Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Cleaver v. Maye
as 14-3213
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES FLOYD CLEAVER
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE
Conkleton v. Raemisch, et al
as 14-1271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES K. CONKLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), in his official capacity, BRANDON SHAFFER, Chairman, Colorado Board of Parole, in his official capacity, ALFREDO PENA, Member, Colorado Board of Parole, in his official capacity and others
Cleaver v. Maye
as 14-3149
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES FLOYD CLEAVER
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE
Conkleton v. Raemisch, et al
as 14-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES K. CONKLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), in his official capacity, BRANDON SHAFFER, Chairman, Colorado Board of Parole, in his official capacity, ALFREDO PENA, Member, Colorado Board of Parole, in his official capacity and others
Wofford v. Colvin
as 13-7077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD DEWAYNE WOFFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Floyd v. Ploughe, et al
as 12-1349
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY DALE FLOYD
Respondent - Appellee:
PAMELA PLOUGHE, Warden, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Starr v. Hicks, et al
as 12-5137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE E. STARR
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HICKS, BRYCE LAIR, BOBBY J. FLOYD and others
Kinkead v. Durborow, et al
as 11-5120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK KINKEAD
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY DURBOROW, Sheriff of Ottawa County, RANDALL LLOYD, Ottawa County Jail Administrator, RUTH BENNETT, Citizen of Miami, OK, ER Physician for INTEGRIS-Miami and others
Campbell, Jr. v. Pohlman, et al
as 11-1236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WILLIAM CAMPBELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FLOYD POHLMAN, M.D., GAGAN SINGH, M.D., PAULA FRANTZ, M.D. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.