Cases 31 - 40 of 701
Thomas, Jr. v. Knutson, et al
as 23-7067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOR T. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK KNUTSON, DAVID LOUTHAN, Warden, LADANA HAMILTON and others
Wach v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4123
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL WACH
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE
Carter v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 23-8062
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES KENZELL CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEICOLE MOLDEN, in her official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden and others
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6117
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DAVID CULE, Warden
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6116
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOR T. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK KNUTSON, DAVID LOUTHAN, Warden and others
In re: Brooks
as 23-1247
Petitioner:
In re: BILL JOE BROOKS
Respondent:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 23-8052
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN, in his official capacity, AKA Seth Norris and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rigsby v. Corder, et al
as 23-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. CORDER, CPL. HAYES, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.