Cases 41 - 50 of 531
Boles v. Long, et al
as 21-1238
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL MARSHALL BOLES
Respondent / Appellee:
PHILLIP WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado and JEFF LONG, S.C.F.
Jompp v. Warden of Sterling Prison, et al
as 21-1237
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and WARDEN OF STERLING PRISON
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRIS ALLEN JOMPP
Sharp v. Goodrich, et al
as 21-1229
Respondent / Appellee:
BARRY GOODRICH, Warden, C.C.C.F., COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director of the Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARLEY DAVID SHARP
Sisneros v. Williams, et al
as 21-1220
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, JERRY ROARK and DEAN WILLIAMS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEROME SISNEROS
Cano v. Williams, et al
as 21-1214
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND CANO
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director, C.D.O.C. and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Pepper v. Williams, et al
as 21-1210
Respondent / Appellee:
LARRY SCHULTZ, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DEAN WILLIAMS
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARNEAU VERSILL PEPPER
Cox v. Caley, et al
as 21-1201
Respondent / Appellee:
ED CALEY, Warden of the Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH J. COX
In re: Reed
as 21-1174
Respondent:
PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY C. REED
In re: Moore
as 21-1165
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DEAN WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
LESSELL H. MOORE
Guice v. Little, et al
as 21-1120
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARREL T. GUICE
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and THOMAS LITTLE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
