Cases 61 - 70 of 217
Pinson, et al v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, et al
as 15-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON and MIKEAL G. STINE
Plaintiff:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DIGNAM and others
Stine, et al v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, et al
as 15-1223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL G. STINE
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON and LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DIGNAM and others
Pinson v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, et al
as 15-1217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Plaintiff:
LEROY BUHL and MIKEAL G. STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DIGNAM and others
Ghailani v. Lynch, et al
as 15-1128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMED KHALFAN GHAILANI, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, US Attorney General, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
In re: Hansen
as 15-3038
Petitioner:
BRIAN HANSEN
Respondent:
CLAUDE MAYE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
In re: Custard
as 15-1003
Petitioner:
BOB ALLEN CUSTARD
Respondent:
DAVID ALLRED, YVETTE BROUILLET-FETTERHOFF, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3268
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leffebre v. Davis, et al
as 14-1447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE DAVID LEFFEBRE
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE R. DAVIS, DAVID BERKEBILE, CAPTAIN KRIST and others
Buhl v. Rangel, et al
as 14-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA RANGEL, D. BERKEBILE, BOB CUSTARD and others
Mohammed v. Holder, et al
as 14-1325
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KHALFAN KHAMIS MOHAMMED
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, DAVID BERKEBILE, ADX Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
