Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Johnson v. Progressive Leasing, et al
as 23-4090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE LEASING, NPRTO NEW YORK and AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION
Long John Silvers v. American Arbitration
as 10-6249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONG JOHN SILVERS INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION
Burbank v. United States District Court, et al
as 10-4126
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant:
JAMES W. BURBANK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, all Judges, UTAH STATE POLITICAL ENTITIES, UTAH TAX COMMISSION and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellant:
DALE NOLEN STEVENS
Counterclaim-Defendant:
MARTIN TERRY CAMPBELL, CURTIS RICHMOND, THOMAS SMITH and others
Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH, JOANN B. STRINGHAM, Uintah County Attorney, RICK HAWKINS and others
Burbank v. United States District Cour, et al
as 08-4097
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant:
JAMES W. BURBANK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, all Judges, UTAH STATE POLITICAL ENTITIES, UTAH TAX COMMISSION and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellant:
DALE NOLEN STEVENS
Counterclaim-Defendant:
MARTIN TERRY CAMPBELL, CURTIS RICHMOND, THOMAS SMITH and others
Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH, JOANN B. STRINGHAM, Uintah County Attorney, RICK HAWKINS and others
Burbank v. United States District Court, et al
as 08-4092
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant:
JAMES W. BURBANK
Defendant:
UINTAH COUNTY, Political subdivision of the State of Utah, UTAH STATE POLITICAL ENTITIES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, All Judges and others
Counterclaim-Defendant:
MARTIN TERRY CAMPBELL, THOMAS SMITH, DALE NOLEN STEVENS and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS RICHMOND
Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
RICK HAWKINS, JOANN B. STRINGHAM, Uintah County Attorney, JOHN LAURSEN, Uintah County Deputy Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
