Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Davis v. Clark, et al
as 12-3194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL W. CLARK, District Court Judge, JENNIFER L. JONES, Kansas Judicial Judge, RICHARD BALLINGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Parkinson, et al
as 10-3275
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK PARKINSON, Governor and STEVE N. SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Davis v. United States, et al
as 09-3205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAM A. CROW, United States Senior District Court Judge, ELIZABETH RICE, Secretary of Corrections and others
Anthony Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent, et al
as 09-3204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a municipal corporation, adjunct and political division of Kansas, CAROL J. BACON, JANE AND JOHN DOES and others
Davis v. Kansas State Board, et al
as 09-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a Municipal Corporation, Adjunct and Political Subdivision of Kansas, JOHN AND JANE DOES A-Z, Public Defenders/Administrators, individually and as employees to Kansas State Board of Indigents Defense Services, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Kansas, JESSICA R. KUHEN and others
Davis v. Rice, et al
as 08-3164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH L. RICE, Secretary of Corrections Designee, individually and as an employee for the Kansas Department of Corrections, SAM CLINE, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, individually and as an employee for the Kansas Department of Corrections, JOHN/JANE DOES, Employees, in their individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
