Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Walker v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 14-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, in his individual capacity, BILL RITTER, JR., in his individual capacity, TOM CLEMENTS, in his individual and official capacities and others
Hamlin v. Zavaras, et al
as 12-1345
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOJO HAMLIN
Respondent - Appellee:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
In re: Shattuck
as 12-1114
Petitioner:
BERNARD SHATTUCK
Respondent:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS and THE COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Taylor v. Zavaras, et al
as 12-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN LEE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, SUSAN S. JONES, MARSHALL CARIFFITH and others
Laratta v. Brown, et al
as 11-1183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GIOVANNI LARATTA
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM BROWN, SUSAN JONES, ROBERT ALLEN and others
Coppinger v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CANDY COPPINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, ANTHONY DECESARO, LARRY REID and others
Winkler v. Mullarky, et al
as 11-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN MANDEL WINKLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY J. MULLARKY, GREGORY J. HOBB, JR., ALEX J. MARTINEZ, Justice and others
St. James v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1091
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MARK ST. JAMES
Respondent - Appellee:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Gillison v. Ritter, et al
as 10-1566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GILLISON
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL RITTER, Governor of Colorado, JOHN W. SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General, NICOLE S. GELLAR, Deputy Attorney General and others
Winkler v. AG of State of Colorado, et al
as 10-1554
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN MANDEL WINKLER
Respondent - Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
