Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 21-3121
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GRAY REED & MCGRAW LLP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, GRAY REED & MCGRAW LLP and others
Appellee:
ABREO & CARTER, BARRETT WYLIE, LLC, W. DEAN BELK, JR., Attorney at Law and others
Appellant:
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, GRAY REED & MCGRAW, P.C. and others
Smith v. Mantle
as 19-6120
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WHETSEL, STACY BOWEIN, DAVID PRATTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Smith v. Howell, et al
as 13-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM E. HOWELL, JR., Safety Manager, Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official and individual capacity, JOHN PARENT, Custodial Maintenance Services Manager, Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official and individual capacity,, TERESA HARTFIELD, Education Administrator/Principle, Federal Bureau of Prisons, in her official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, H. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Dugan, et al v. Amtex Security, Inc., et al
as 13-7004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE T. DUGAN, LARRY W. DURBIN, JESSE R. MASTERS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMTEX SECURITY, INC., DBA Amtex Global Services and INTERNATIONAL UNION SECURITY, POLICE AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION NO. 796
Durbin v. Province
as 11-7028
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK LEE DURBIN
Respondent - Appellee:
GREG PROVINCE, Warden
Smith v. United States, et al
as 08-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Smith v. United States, et al
as 07-3242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, H. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
