Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 13-1164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director B.O.P., MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director B.O.P. and RON WILEY, Warden ADX Supermax
Still v. Herndon, et al
as 11-1463
Petitioner - Appellant:
MINOR MICHAEL STILL
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY HERNDON, Administrative Service, U.S. Marshall, Colorado, KEN DEAL, Deputy United States Marshal, Colorado and HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Stine v. Allred
as 11-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ALLRED, Mr. Clinical Director ADX
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, BOP, MICHAEL K. NALLEY, Regional Dir. BOP N.O. Region and others
Pinson v. Pacheco, et al
as 11-1231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PACHECO, SARA REVELL, MERRY WILNER and others
Pinson v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, DELBERT SAVERS and SARA REVELL
Saleh, et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-1072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED SALEH, EL-SAYYID NOSAIR and IBRAHIM ELGABROWNY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Radick v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RADICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, F.B.O.P., MIKE NALLEY, Regional Director, F.B.O.P., N. FIELDS, Administrative Remedy Coordinator North Central Regional Office and others
Pinson v. Pacheco, et al
as 10-1576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PACHECO, SARA REVELL, MERRY WILNER and others
Pinson v. Pacheco, et al
as 10-1553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PACHECO, SARA REVELL, MERRY WILNER and others
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 10-1392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and BLAKE DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
