Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Grant, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6129
Plaintiff: JOHN M. GRANT, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Defendant: STEVE BURRAGE, EDWARD EVANS, Warden, KEVIN J. GROSS and others
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant: WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified: BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee: ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant: JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae: ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
Glossip, et al v. Gross, et al
as 19-6002
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL W. ROACH, DIANNE B. OWENS, LAURA PITTMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALFRED B. MITCHELL, JOHN M. GRANT, BENJAMIN R. COLE, by and through his next friend Robert S. Jackson and others
Petitioner / Appellant: WADE LAY
Warner, et al v. Gross, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES F. WARNER, BENJAMIN R. COLE, by and through his next friend Robert S. Jackson, JOHN M. GRANT and others
Plaintiff: JAMES A. CODDINGTON, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ, NICHOLAS A. DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN J. GROSS, MICHAEL W. ROACH, STEVE BURRAGE and others
Defendant: H-UNIT SECTION CHIEF X and JOHN DOE EXECUTIONERS #1-10
Movant: ZIVA BRANSTETTER
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, DIANE REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, HERMAN TOLBERT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages and others
Defendant - Appellee: AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 14-7010
Defendant / Appellee: SHIELDS OPERATING, INC., an Arkansas corporation, STEPHENS PRODUCTION COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, BRAZIL CREEK MINERALS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation and others
Defendant: BISHOP TRUCKING, an Oklahoma corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENNETT TANKSLEY, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, CHARLES TACKETT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, HERMAN TOLBERT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Petitioner: WILLIAM REECE, DIANE REECE, HERMAN TOLBERT and others
Respondent: AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Respondent: HANNA OIL & GAS COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ENERVEST OPERATING, LLC and others
Petitioner: DIANE REECE, WILLIAM REECE, SUSAN HOLMES and others
In re: Level 3 Communication We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1029
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM A. POPPO
Plaintiff: ADAM SKAGGS, JOHN S. BURKE, MARILYN A. IDES and others
Defendant - Appellee: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KEVIN J. O'HARA, JAMES Q. CROWE and others
: , , and others
Merritt v. Standifird We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6300
Petitioner - Appellant: KEVIN J. MERRITT
Respondent - Appellee: JANE STANDIFIRD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?