Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sharp v. Rohling, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3090
Petitioner - Appellant: KIMBERLY D. SHARP
Respondent - Appellee: KAREN ROHLING, Warden, Larned Correctional Metal Health Facility and STEPHEN SIX, Attorney General for the State of Kansas
In re: Caenen, Jr., et al
as 12-3050
Not A Party In Lower Court - Petitioner: ARTHUR J. CAENEN, JR.
Not A Party In Lower Court - Respondent: KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden
Smith v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3124
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLES E. SIMMONS, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections, BILL CUMMINGS, Deputy Secretary of Corrections/Risk Management, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Grissom v. Rohling
as 11-3009
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE E. GRISSOM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN ROHLING
In re: Shobe
as 10-3323
Petitioner: SEAN R SHOBE
Respondent: KAREN ROHLING, Warden
Grissom v. Rohling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3306
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE E. GRISSOM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN ROHLING
Grissom v. Rohling
as 10-3249
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE E. GRISSOM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN ROHLING
Pierce v. Rohling
as 09-3144
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS
In re: Arthur Caenen, Jr.
as 09-3142
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR J. CAENEN, JR.
Respondent: KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Larson-White v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3349
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY STEVEN LARSON-WHITE
Respondent - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, STATE OF KANSAS and STEVE MCKIEARNAN, Chaplin

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?