Cases 1 - 10 of 35
United States v. Elliott
as 23-1331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOHAMMED AKIM ELLIOTT
United States v. Elliott
as 23-1581
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOHAMMED AKIM ELLIOTT
Torgerson, et al v. LCC International
as 23-3039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD TORGERSON, ROBERT HALL, SHELLEY GORDON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia corporation
Defendant:
KENNY YOUNG, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL and others
Mohamed v. Jones, et al
as 22-1453
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KHALFAN KHAMIS MOHAMED
Defendant / Appellant:
JONES, HUDDLESTON, OSAGIE and others
Sheikh v. Choate, et al
as 22-1311
Petitioner:
MOHAMED SHEIKH
Respondent:
JOHN FABBRICATORE, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Denver, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, TAE JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Acting Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Al Ghareeb v. Board of Trustees
as 20-1178
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMED AL GHAREEB
Elliott v. Brown
as 20-1175
Petitioner / Appellant:
MOHAMMED ELLIOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
TYLER S. BROWN, in his official capacity as Arapahoe County Sheriff
Torgerson, et al v. LCC International, et al
as 20-3020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY NAVEJAR, AMY OLIPHANT, RODNEY MARTIN and others
Defendant:
DAN MOSS, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia corporation
Laghmari v. Barr
as 19-9572
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED LAGHMARI
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
