Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Konecny v. U.S. Small Business Administration, et al
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, ISABEL GUZMAN, LORAINE BURTON and others
Shuler v. U.S. Small Business Administration
as 24-6036
Plaintiff:
TYLER JOHN SHULER
Defendant:
U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9528
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9527
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9526
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH, JR.
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. Small Business Administration, et al
as 20-1010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD ENGLISH
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO, CHRIS PILKERTON, Acting Administrator of the Small Business Administration and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Oklahoma ex rel. Dep't Transp. v. United States, SBA, et al
as 14-5100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Defendant - Appellant:
ARVEST BANK, a foreign corporation
Defendant:
CROW REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, CROW ENTERPRISES, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, DBA Turnpike Chrysler Jeep Dodge, COUNTY TREASURER OF OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA and others
First Interstate Bank v. Ram, Inc., et al
as 12-8066
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK, a banking association
Defendant:
FRONTIER CERTIFIED DEVELOPMENT CO.
Defendant Cross-Defendant:
RAM, INC., DAVID A. RAMAGE, VISION BANK and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellant:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
