Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Becker v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-4022
Plaintiff / Appellee: LYNN D. BECKER
Defendant / Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe and a federally chartered corporation, UINTAH AND OURAY TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE and UTE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware LLC
Appellee: JOHN P. JURRIUS
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. McKee, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-4098
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY D. MCKEE, MCKEE FARMS, INC., T & L LIVESTOCK, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Chegup, et al v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al
as 20-4015
Plaintiff / Appellant: LYNDA M. KOZLOWICZ, ANGELITA M. CHEGUP, MARY CAROL JENKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee: SHAUN CHAPOOSE, EDRED SECAKUKU, SAL WOPSOCK and others
Chegup, et al v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4178
Plaintiff / Appellant: LYNDA M. KOZLOWICZ, ANGELITA M. CHEGUP, MARY CAROL JENKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee: THE TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE FOR THE UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, LUKE DUNCAN, UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe and others
Becker v. Ute Indian Tribe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4175
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: LYNN D. BECKER
Defendant Counterclaimant Third-Party Plaintiff - Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally chartered corporation, UINTAH AND OURAY TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE and UTE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware LLC
Third-Party Defendant - Appellee: BARRY G. LAWRENCE
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al v. Lawrence, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4154
Plaintiff - Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, and a federally chartered corporation, UINTAH AND OURAY TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE, Chairman of the Uintah and Ouray Tribal Business Committee and UTE ENERGY HOLDINGS, a Delaware LLC
Defendant - Appellee: HONORABLE BARRY G. LAWRENCE, District Judge, Utah Third Judicial District Court, in his Individual and Offical Capacities and LYNN D. BECKER
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. State of Utah, et al
as 16-4021
Plaintiff - Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Defendant - Appellee: THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, ROOSEVELT CITY, a municipal corporation and others
Defendant: JOHN SWALLOW
Norton, et al v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-4170
Plaintiff - Appellee: VANCE NORTON, GARY JENSEN, KEITH CAMPBELL and others
Defendant - Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, BUSINESS COMMITTEE FOR THE UTE TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, in its official capacity, UTE TRIBAL COURT OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION and others
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. State of Utah, et al
as 15-4154
Plaintiff - Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Defendant - Appellee: THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, ROOSEVELT CITY, a municipal corporation and others
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. Myton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-4080
Plaintiff - Appellant: UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Defendant - Appellee: MYTON, a municipal corporation
Defendant: THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, ROOSEVELT CITY, a municipal corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?