Cases 111 - 120 of 2,721
Ward v. CNL Tulsa LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Ward
Defendant:
CNL Tulsa LLC and TGC Hospitality Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
T.A.I.T. v. Montero
as 4:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
T.A.I.T.
Defendant:
Frank R Montero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Dominion Communications, LLC
as 4:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Amanda Young
Defendant:
Dominion Communications, LLC an Oklahoma limited liability company doing business as Atlas Broadband
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Montero v. Tulsa Airport Improvement Trust et al
as 4:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Frank R Montero
Defendant:
Tulsa Airport Improvement Trust, City of Tulsa, Tammy Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Randall v. Pawnee County Sheriff et al
as 4:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen Randall
Defendant:
Pawnee County Sheriff, Marty Wilson, Mike Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Teri Evans
Defendant:
Scott Walton, Michael Glover, Unknown Rogers County Deputy Sheriffs 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
