Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Fitts et al v. Newberry et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Colby Blake Fitts and Kayla Nicole Fitts
Defendant:
Don Newberry, Amy Strahan, Tiffany McDaniels Acting Head Teller doing business as Madison County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rhoades v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00075
Defendant:
Charles Jackson and Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vitt v. Koons Fuller, P.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00493
Defendant:
Alagood Cartwright Burke, P.C., Bruce McFarling, Jackson and Hagen and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Vitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Wesley Prince
Defendant:
City of Tulsa , Stephen Tidwell, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooper et al v. M & M Waffles, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00138
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cooper , Lisa Hill , Latoya Jackson and others
Defendant:
M & M Waffles, L.L.C. and Waffle House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fernandes v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2016cv00630
Plaintiff:
Elton Fernandes
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma , Craig Brown and Mike Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Coons et al
as 4:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Roy L Jackson
Defendant:
Richard Coons and David M. Dryer & Dryer & Associates P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
